By far, PCs were more popular, largely thanks to the fact that credit wizard v1 1 for pretty much anyone could build.
Ask any one automaker and theyll say Ours, of course.
The upcoming EV era could become something to actually look forward to, as opposed to something that just must be accepted.
In the PC world, it was easier, because there was already a target standard (IBM) and there was minimal pride associated with the other standards.And, to a large degree, standards like that still exist today.Companies built what sold, and what sold fit the standard.Besides the bonkers official announcements from Ford about a new Bronco and Ranger, the automaker.With help of Michigans transportation department, the project has led to traffic signals alerting cars using a Dedicated Short Range Communication systemmeaning it could transmit about 300 metersto alert the driver that they might run a red light, Cadillac said in a news release.
Photo: Cadillac, vehicle-to-infrastructure tech (V2I) is a tool often touted by some automakers as being key to making the roads safer by allowing cars to communicate with traffic signals and the like.First, lets do a quick overview of personal computing timelines: The 1970s saw the first major wave of personal computers, mostly to hardcore, tech saavy, hobbyists, the 1980s was the first real home computer explosion, with large numbers of competing, incompatible standards and OSes, and.This modularity meant that the consumer had a vast array of options: computers could be bought all across the spectrum of cost and power and quality, and it was very easy to build your own custom setup, or upgrade an existing one.This makes a pretty good argument for regulating this sort of thing at the federal and maybe even international level.While promising, itll only benefit other CTS owners on the road; until V2V is mandated across the board for carmakers, like the government wants, itll probably remain that way for some time.I want a future where someone can go to a junkyard and yank a motor from a Tesla Model H (you know, the one with the T-top) and plan to pop it into their Reatta EV knowing that the connections will fit.Modular, standards-driven EVs dont have to mean boring, cookie-cutter cars; in fact, itd be the opposite.But EV technology is significantly different than conventional car technology, and those differences open up production and saled options that havent previously been available.(damn, I forgot how much we must have hated banking back in the 90s.).EVs are, to a far greater degree than a conventional car, plug-and-play.
They managed to do this and keep high standards of quality and a unique design aesthetic, proving that you dont need to be proprietary to stand out.
If the basic components: motors, ECUs, center stack displays, etc.